A low-priority enhancement request. For this code: void main() { ubyte x; ubyte y = x << 1; } The range analysis determines that it's conceivable to the result of that expression to not fit in y, so the D compiler 2.064alpha gives: temp.d(3): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(int)x << 1) of type int to ubyte To help the programmer understand faster the mistake in his/her code when expressions become more complex I think it's also useful to print the range resulting from the analysis, like: temp.d(3): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(int)x << 1) in interval [0 ... 510] of type int to ubyte It uses 3 dots because it's an interval that includes the right end. Otherwise if you print an interval open on the right in a case like this you have to print a ulong.max+1 value: void main() { ulong x; int y = x; } One downside: those error messages become a little longer (and a bit more noisy).
> temp.d(3): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(int)x << 1) in > interval [0 ... 510] of type int to ubyte Jonathan M Davis suggests to use a more mathematical syntax to denote an interval closed on the right, like: temp.d(3): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(int)x << 1) in interval [0, 510] of type int to ubyte
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18615 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB