I have listed this as SSE2 instructions however there may be more affected (it could be the prefix in general rather than these particular instructions). ``` extern(C) void blah() { asm { naked; xor EAX, EAX; jmp [RIP]; cvttpd2dq XMM0, XMM1; movq [RAX], XMM0; } } ``` Yields ``` blah: 0000: 31 C0 xor EAX,EAX 0002: 48 FF 25 00 00 00 00 jmp qword ptr [00h][RIP] 0009:66 0F E6 C1 cvttpd2dq XMM0,XMM1 000d:66 0F D6 00 movq [RAX],XMM0 ``` The latter two instructions are not displayed properly. From llvm's objdump we get: ``` 0000000000000000 blah: 0: 31 c0 xor eax, eax 2: 48 ff 25 00 00 00 00 jmp qword ptr [rip] 9: 66 0f e6 c1 cvttpd2dq xmm0, xmm1 d: 66 0f d6 00 movq qword ptr [rax], xmm0 11: 00 00 add byte ptr [rax], al 13: 00 <unknown> ``` From GNU: ``` 0000000000000000 <blah>: 0: 31 c0 xor eax,eax 2: 48 ff 25 00 00 00 00 rex.W jmp QWORD PTR [rip+0x0] # 9 <blah+0x9> 9: 66 0f e6 c1 cvttpd2dq xmm0,xmm1 d: 66 0f d6 00 movq QWORD PTR [rax],xmm0 11: 00 00 add BYTE PTR [rax],al ```
I think it may be the prefix; I can trigger this issue reliably with plain ol' leas and calls using code from my Intel 8080 assembler. But like you, it's that 66 prefix causing issues: Code in question: ``` import std.stdio; import std.range; string label; string argument1, argument2; void title() { if ((label.empty && !argument1.empty && !argument2.empty) == false) stderr.writeln("argument check failed"); } ``` Relevant -vasm output: ``` _D4vasm5titleFZv: 0000: 55 push RBP 0001: 48 8B EC mov RBP,RSP 0004:66 48 8D 3D FC FF FF FF lea RDI,[0FFFFFFFCh][RIP] 000c:66 66 48 E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 0014: 48 89 C7 mov RDI,RAX 0017: E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 001c: 84 C0 test AL,AL 001e: 74 38 je L58 0020:66 48 8D 3D FC FF FF FF lea RDI,[0FFFFFFFCh][RIP] 0028:66 66 48 E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 0030: 48 89 C7 mov RDI,RAX 0033: E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 0038: 34 01 xor AL,1 003a: 74 1C je L58 003c:66 48 8D 3D FC FF FF FF lea RDI,[0FFFFFFFCh][RIP] 0044:66 66 48 E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 004c: 48 89 C7 mov RDI,RAX 004f: E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 0054: 34 01 xor AL,1 0056: 75 04 jne L5c 0058: 31 C0 xor EAX,EAX 005a: EB 05 jmp short L61 005c: B8 01 00 00 00 mov EAX,1 0061: A8 01 test AL,1 0063: 75 19 jne L7e 0065: E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 006a: 48 8D 15 FC FF FF FF lea RDX,[0FFFFFFFCh][RIP] 0071: BE 15 00 00 00 mov EAX,015h 0076: 48 89 C7 mov RDI,RAX 0079: E8 00 00 00 00 call L0 007e: 5D pop RBP 007f: C3 ret ``` Here's GNU objdump for comparison: ``` 0000000000000000 <_D4vasm5titleFZv>: 0: 55 push %rbp 1: 48 8b ec mov %rsp,%rbp 4: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 data16 lea 0x0(%rip),%rdi # c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0xc> b: 00 c: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 data16 data16 rex.W call 14 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x14> 13: 00 14: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi 17: e8 00 00 00 00 call 1c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x1c> 1c: 84 c0 test %al,%al 1e: 74 38 je 58 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x58> 20: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 data16 lea 0x0(%rip),%rdi # 28 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x28> 27: 00 28: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 data16 data16 rex.W call 30 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x30> 2f: 00 30: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi 33: e8 00 00 00 00 call 38 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x38> 38: 34 01 xor $0x1,%al 3a: 74 1c je 58 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x58> 3c: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 data16 lea 0x0(%rip),%rdi # 44 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x44> 43: 00 44: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 data16 data16 rex.W call 4c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x4c> 4b: 00 4c: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi 4f: e8 00 00 00 00 call 54 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x54> 54: 34 01 xor $0x1,%al 56: 75 04 jne 5c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x5c> 58: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax 5a: eb 05 jmp 61 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x61> 5c: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax 61: a8 01 test $0x1,%al 63: 75 19 jne 7e <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x7e> 65: e8 00 00 00 00 call 6a <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x6a> 6a: 48 8d 15 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rip),%rdx # 71 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x71> 71: be 15 00 00 00 mov $0x15,%esi 76: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi 79: e8 00 00 00 00 call 7e <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x7e> 7e: 5d pop %rbp 7f: c3 ret ``` llvm-objdump looks a bit nicer: ``` 0000000000000000 <_D4vasm5titleFZv>: 0: 55 pushq %rbp 1: 48 8b ec movq %rsp, %rbp 4: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 00 leaq (%rip), %rdi # 0xc <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0xc> c: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x14 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x14> 14: 48 89 c7 movq %rax, %rdi 17: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x1c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x1c> 1c: 84 c0 testb %al, %al 1e: 74 38 je 0x58 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x58> 20: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 00 leaq (%rip), %rdi # 0x28 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x28> 28: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x30 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x30> 30: 48 89 c7 movq %rax, %rdi 33: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x38 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x38> 38: 34 01 xorb $1, %al 3a: 74 1c je 0x58 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x58> 3c: 66 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 00 leaq (%rip), %rdi # 0x44 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x44> 44: 66 66 48 e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x4c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x4c> 4c: 48 89 c7 movq %rax, %rdi 4f: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x54 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x54> 54: 34 01 xorb $1, %al 56: 75 04 jne 0x5c <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x5c> 58: 31 c0 xorl %eax, %eax 5a: eb 05 jmp 0x61 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x61> 5c: b8 01 00 00 00 movl $1, %eax 61: a8 01 testb $1, %al 63: 75 19 jne 0x7e <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x7e> 65: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x6a <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x6a> 6a: 48 8d 15 00 00 00 00 leaq (%rip), %rdx # 0x71 <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x71> 71: be 15 00 00 00 movl $21, %esi 76: 48 89 c7 movq %rax, %rdi 79: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x7e <_D4vasm5titleFZv+0x7e> 7e: 5d popq %rbp 7f: c3 retq ```
@WalterBright created dlang/dmd pull request #13510 "fix Issue 22656 - SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the …" fixing this issue: - fix Issue 22656 - SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/13510
dlang/dmd pull request #13510 "fix Issue 22656 - SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the …" was merged into master: - a0809bbc4642fe679bee83d1f3d8bfe0ae3691e0 by Walter Bright: fix Issue 22656 - SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/13510