D issues are now tracked on GitHub. This Bugzilla instance remains as a read-only archive.
Issue 4044 - [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors
Summary: [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: D
Classification: Unclassified
Component: dmd (show other issues)
Version: D1 (retired)
Hardware: Other All
: P2 normal
Assignee: No Owner
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 1001 1079 1497 1955 2741 3207 3214 3387 3389 3391 3657 3987 4013 4014 4037 4038 4039 4148 4149 4154 4180 4181 4212 4863 6122 6124
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-04-02 13:45 UTC by Robert Clipsham
Modified: 2014-04-18 09:12 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Robert Clipsham 2010-04-02 13:45:09 UTC
This tracker bug is intended to keep track of all issues that cause difficulties with debugging D. These include invalid DWARF output, errors from gdb or other debuggers that appear to be caused by bad debugging information, as well as any other issues that make debugging D applications difficult or even impossible.
Comment 1 Brad Roberts 2012-02-01 21:10:39 UTC
closing, we don't need a tracker to track other bugs.
Comment 2 Walter Bright 2012-02-01 21:19:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> closing, we don't need a tracker to track other bugs.

I agree, that's what keywords are for. In this case, symdeb.
Comment 3 Stewart Gordon 2012-02-02 12:16:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> closing, we don't need a tracker to track other bugs.

Why have you singled this one out over all the other trackers here?

Moreover, trackers are accepted on various Bugzilla installations, and widely used on Mozilla's own.  There was also a brief thread about it
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/bugs/7640.html

(In reply to comment #2)
> I agree, that's what keywords are for. In this case, symdeb.

So are we going to have keywords created to replace all of the trackers here that don't already have keywords to the effect?
Comment 4 Brad Roberts 2012-02-02 18:04:25 UTC
Because it's one that I hit in looking at a set of bugs and opted to get rid of.  As to the others, they'll be delt with opportunistically and depending on the situation surrounding them.  I don't intend to make any sort of general policy statements, it's hardly worth getting into a debate about, certainly not in the middle of bugzilla.