This D2 program, compiled with dmd 2.048b: import std.stdio; void main() { int[string] aa = ["10":10, "20":20]; writeln(aa); } Prints (note the 1:10, that is a bug): 20:20 1:10 The expected less buggy and less barbaric output is: ["10": 10, "20": 20] Or: ["20": 20, "10": 10]
This D2 code: import std.stdio; void main() { int[int[int]] aa; aa[[5:6, 7:8]] = 2; writeln(aa); } gives the useless output: 5:6 7:8:2
(In reply to comment #0) > This D2 program, compiled with dmd 2.048b: > > > import std.stdio; > void main() { > int[string] aa = ["10":10, "20":20]; > writeln(aa); > } > > > Prints (note the 1:10, that is a bug): > 20:20 1:10 > > > The expected less buggy and less barbaric output is: > ["10": 10, "20": 20] > Or: > ["20": 20, "10": 10] It get's even worse: import std.stdio; void main() { int[string] aa = ["100":1, "200":1, "300":1, "400":1]; writeln(aa); } Prints: 400:1 3:1 2:1 1:1 For your second code, I agree. I would prefer if D took an approach similar to other languages and printed out something like: [[5:6, 7:8]:2]
Whitespace is important for readability, so instead of: [[5:6, 7:8]:2] It's better to print a space after the colon: [[5: 6, 7: 8]: 2]
This function (related to the coding Kata Word Chains) creates an associative array where the keys are the start chars of words, and the values are sets of words. For simplicity in D2 I have implemented the string sets as bool[string]. import std.stdio, std.string; bool[string][char] foo(string[] names) { typeof(return) result; foreach (name; names) result[name[0]][name] = true; return result; } auto names = "mary patricia linda barbara elizabeth jennifer maria susan margaret dorothy lisa nancy karen betty helen sandra donna carol ruth sharon michelle laura sarah kimberly deborah jessica shirley cynthia angela melissa brenda amy anna rebecca virginia kathleen pamela"; void main() { writeln(foo(names.split())); } The original complete program didn't have to print this result, but there I have created a bug, so I have had to print result, as I have done in this reduced program. This is the printout: p:patricia:true pamela:true l:linda:true lisa:true laura:true d:dorothy:true donna:true deborah:true h:helen:true m:melissa:true margaret:true michelle:true maria:true mary:true e:elizabeth:true a:angela:true anna:true amy:true b:barbara:true betty:true brenda:true j:jessica:true jennifer:true n:nancy:true r:ruth:true rebecca:true v:virginia:true s:sharon:true susan:true shirley:true sandra:true sarah:true k:kathleen:true karen:true kimberly:true c:cynthia:true carol:true For me this is very bad, I am not able to read it well. Nesting of dictionaries produces a hard to read output. To better show what I mean this a Python2.6 translation (here I have used true sets, that are built-in, but the situation doesn't change a lot): from collections import defaultdict def foo(names): result = defaultdict(set) for name in names: result[name[0]].add(name) return result names = """mary patricia linda barbara elizabeth jennifer maria susan margaret dorothy lisa nancy karen betty helen sandra donna carol ruth sharon michelle laura sarah kimberly deborah jessica shirley cynthia angela melissa brenda amy anna rebecca virginia kathleen pamela""" print foo(names.split()) Its textual output allows me to tell apart sub-dictionaries: defaultdict(<type 'set'>, {'a': set(['amy', 'anna', 'angela']), 'c': set(['carol', 'cynthia']), 'b': set(['barbara', 'betty', 'brenda']), 'e': set(['elizabeth']), 'd': set(['dorothy', 'donna', 'deborah']), 'h': set(['helen']), 'k': set(['kathleen', 'kimberly', 'karen']), 'j': set(['jessica', 'jennifer']), 'm': set(['margaret', 'melissa', 'michelle', 'mary', 'maria']), 'l': set(['laura', 'linda', 'lisa']), 'n': set(['nancy']), 'p': set(['pamela', 'patricia']), 's': set(['sarah', 'sharon', 'sandra', 'shirley', 'susan']), 'r': set(['ruth', 'rebecca']), 'v': set(['virginia'])}) Using pprint (pretty print) from the Python standard library it improves: from pprint import pprint pprint(dict(foo(names.split()))) {'a': set(['amy', 'angela', 'anna']), 'b': set(['barbara', 'betty', 'brenda']), 'c': set(['carol', 'cynthia']), 'd': set(['deborah', 'donna', 'dorothy']), 'e': set(['elizabeth']), 'h': set(['helen']), 'j': set(['jennifer', 'jessica']), 'k': set(['karen', 'kathleen', 'kimberly']), 'l': set(['laura', 'linda', 'lisa']), 'm': set(['margaret', 'maria', 'mary', 'melissa', 'michelle']), 'n': set(['nancy']), 'p': set(['pamela', 'patricia']), 'r': set(['rebecca', 'ruth']), 's': set(['sandra', 'sarah', 'sharon', 'shirley', 'susan']), 'v': set(['virginia'])} This is even better: {'a': {"amy", "angela", "anna"}, 'b': {"barbara", "betty", "brenda"}, 'c': {"carol", "cynthia"}, 'd': {"deborah", "donna", "dorothy"}, 'e': {"elizabeth"}, 'h': {"helen"}, 'j': {"jennifer", "jessica"}, 'k': {"karen", "kathleen", "kimberly"}, 'l': {"laura", "linda", "lisa"}, 'm': {"margaret", "maria", "mary", "melissa", "michelle"}, 'n': {"nancy"}, 'p': {"pamela", "patricia"}, 'r': {"rebecca", "ruth"}, 's': {"sandra", "sarah", "sharon", "shirley", "susan"}, 'v': {"virginia"} } If you want a more apples-to-apples comparison this is Python code that uses the same data structure used by the D code: from collections import defaultdict def foo(names): result = defaultdict(dict) for name in names: result[name[0]][name] = True return result names = """mary patricia linda barbara elizabeth jennifer maria susan margaret dorothy lisa nancy karen betty helen sandra donna carol ruth sharon michelle laura sarah kimberly deborah jessica shirley cynthia angela melissa brenda amy anna rebecca virginia kathleen pamela""" print foo(names.split()) Its textual output: defaultdict(<type 'dict'>, {'a': {'amy': True, 'anna': True, 'angela': True}, 'c': {'carol': True, 'cynthia': True}, 'b': {'barbara': True, 'betty': True, 'brenda': True}, 'e': {'elizabeth': True}, 'd': {'dorothy': True, 'donna': True, 'deborah': True}, 'h': {'helen': True}, 'k': {'kathleen': True, 'kimberly': True, 'karen': True}, 'j': {'jessica': True, 'jennifer': True}, 'm': {'margaret': True, 'melissa': True, 'michelle': True, 'mary': True, 'maria': True}, 'l': {'laura': True, 'linda': True, 'lisa': True}, 'n': {'nancy': True}, 'p': {'pamela': True, 'patricia': True}, 's': {'sarah': True, 'sharon': True, 'sandra': True, 'shirley': True, 'susan': True}, 'r': {'ruth': True, 'rebecca': True}, 'v': {'virginia': True}}) Using pprint: {'a': {'amy': True, 'angela': True, 'anna': True}, 'b': {'barbara': True, 'betty': True, 'brenda': True}, 'c': {'carol': True, 'cynthia': True}, 'd': {'deborah': True, 'donna': True, 'dorothy': True}, 'e': {'elizabeth': True}, 'h': {'helen': True}, 'j': {'jennifer': True, 'jessica': True}, 'k': {'karen': True, 'kathleen': True, 'kimberly': True}, 'l': {'laura': True, 'linda': True, 'lisa': True}, 'm': {'margaret': True, 'maria': True, 'mary': True, 'melissa': True, 'michelle': True}, 'n': {'nancy': True}, 'p': {'pamela': True, 'patricia': True}, 'r': {'rebecca': True, 'ruth': True}, 's': {'sandra': True, 'sarah': True, 'sharon': True, 'shirley': True, 'susan': True}, 'v': {'virginia': True}} Even without pprint the printout of the default dict is usable for my debugging because it allows me to tell apart the sub-dictionaries. Another help comes from using "" and '' around chars and strings present inside collections. A prettyPrint() function in Phobos will help, but first in D2 I'd like writeln() to print that D data structure more or less like this: ['a': ["amy": true, "anna": true, "angela": true], 'c': ["carol": true, "cynthia": true], 'b': ["barbara": true, "betty": true, "brenda": true], 'e': ["elizabeth": true], 'd': ["dorothy": true, "donna": true, "deborah": true], 'h': ["helen": true], 'k': ["kathleen": true, "kimberly": true, "karen": true], 'j': ["jessica": true, "jennifer": true], 'm': ["margaret": true, "melissa": true, "michelle": true, "mary": true, "maria": true], 'l': ["laura": true, "linda": true, "lisa": true], 'n': ["nancy": true], 'p': ["pamela": true, "patricia": true], 's': ["sarah": true, "sharon": true, "sandra": true, "shirley": true, "susan": true], 'r': ["ruth": true, "rebecca": true], 'v': ["virginia": true]] This is allows me to use the printout for debugging, especially when I reduce the number of names for debugging purposes: ['a': ["amy": true, "anna": true], 'c': ["carol": true], 'b': ["barbara": true, "betty": true], 'd': ["dorothy": true], 'k': ["kathleen": true, "karen": true], 's': ["sandra": true, "shirley": true], 'v': ["virginia": true]] --------------------- KennyTM~ suggests: writeln(to!string(foo(names.split()))); this gives [p:[patricia:true, pamela:true], l:[linda:true, lisa:true, laura:true], d:[dorothy:true, donna:true, deborah:true], h:[helen:true], m:[melissa:true, margaret:true, michelle:true, maria:true, mary:true], e:[elizabeth:true], a:[angela:true, anna:true, amy:true], b:[barbara:true, betty:true, brenda:true], j:[jessica:true, jennifer:true], n:[nancy:true], r:[ruth:true, rebecca:true], v:[virginia:true], s:[sharon:true, susan:true, shirley:true, sandra:true, sarah:true], k:[kathleen:true, karen:true, kimberly:true], c:[cynthia:true, carol:true]] This is better, but this isn't the default representation, I'd like a space after the colons, and ' " around chars and strings in collections.
writeln now produces the intended output on 2.059.
Associative array formatting was improved in 2.055. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/126