D issues are now tracked on GitHub. This Bugzilla instance remains as a read-only archive.
Issue 7891 - int[] broken in vararg if it appears after 5 arguments of type bool
Summary: int[] broken in vararg if it appears after 5 arguments of type bool
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of issue 6758
Alias: None
Product: D
Classification: Unclassified
Component: dmd (show other issues)
Version: D1 (retired)
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
: P2 major
Assignee: No Owner
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-04-11 12:09 UTC by Mathias Baumann
Modified: 2012-04-16 03:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
testcase (1.43 KB, application/octet-stream)
2012-04-16 03:21 UTC, Mathias Baumann 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Mathias Baumann 2012-04-11 12:09:32 UTC 
Certain combination of parameters make an int[] array fail when called at a vararg function _inside_ a class.

Output of attached program for me is:

Note the length of the second inside block

INSIDE:
Size: 16 Array: len: 3 ptr: 7f8e5c733ce0.
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 16 Array: len: 3 ptr: 7f8e5c733ce0.
Size: 1 Bool: 1

INSIDE:
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 16 Array: len: 140249413139680 ptr: 3.
Size: 1 Bool: 224

OUTSIDE:
Size: 16 Array: len: 3 ptr: 7f8e5c733ce0.
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Size: 16 Array: len: 3 ptr: 7f8e5c733ce0.
Size: 1 Bool: 1
Class: 7f8e5c733d00 140249413139712
Comment 1 Don 2012-04-12 08:13:06 UTC 
I think this might be the same as bug 6758. In this case the hidden 'this' parameter is messing with the alignment.
Comment 2 Don 2012-04-13 03:26:23 UTC 
This is a duplicate of bug 6758. See comments there. This is a horrific bug.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6758 ***
Comment 3 Mathias Baumann 2012-04-16 03:21:14 UTC 
Created attachment 1090 [details]
testcase

I thought I added it, but apparently I did not. Here is the testcase.
Comment 4 Leandro Lucarella 2012-04-16 03:41:56 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=1090) [details]
> testcase
> 
> I thought I added it, but apparently I did not. Here is the testcase.

Maybe you should add it to the other bug then :)